16 Cons of FSD V12.3.6 (Review 2024)

Tesla Full Self Driving (FSD) system has sparked a lot of discussion and analysis. While the idea of driving is exciting the current technology often falls short. The latest version, FSD V12.3.6 shows some improvements. Still faces challenges.

This article will delve into the drawbacks of FSD V12.3.6, such, as lane control, speed regulation, detecting pedestrians and obstacles handling turns without protection, behavior on highways, parking capabilities, user interface experience, hardware related issues and its impact on perception and safety.

If you’ve considered all these downsides and still decide to purchase the product then kudos to you for making a choice! You’re likely to be satisfied with your decision!

Uncertainty in Lane Selection

One noticeable flaw of FSD V12.3.6 is its hesitation, in choosing lanes before making maneuvers. The system often struggles to pick the lane at intersections leading to confusion and erratic movements that can be risky.

Issues, with Lane Usage

In FSD V12.3.6 there is a tendency for the vehicle to stay in the lane when it needs to exit soon causing inefficient and sometimes sudden lane changes that disrupt traffic flow and pose potential dangers. This lack of lane discipline is a concern for safe driving.

Challenges with Detecting Traffic Cones

Safe navigation requires the detection of traffic cones in construction zones. Unfortunately FSD V12.3.6 shows inconsistencies in this aspect occasionally failing to detect cones or reacting slowly. This can lead to navigation challenges and safety risks in construction areas where precision’s crucial.

Unexpected Stops

The braking system of FSD V12.3.6 tends to use friction braking aggressively of braking resulting in sudden and uncomfortable stops especially at traffic lights. Such aggressive braking is not ideal for passenger comfort and safety which rely on braking.

Handling Variable Speeds

Another issue is the speed control, especially when approaching dips, in the road.
When the vehicles brakes are either too much or too little it can lead to handling and a bumpy ride. The systems effectiveness falls short. Maintaining a steady speed is crucial, for a smooth driving experience.

Late Responses in Detecting Obstacles and Pedestrians

At times FSD V12.3.6 shows delayed reactions in spotting pedestrians. Once the system suddenly slowed down after noticing a pedestrian at the moment, which could be risky in busy areas. To prevent accidents and ensure safety, timely detection and quick responses are essential.

Challenges in Avoiding Obstacles

Moreover the system struggles to navigate around obstacles like roadside objects and parked cars. The autonomy aimed for by FSD is often compromised by the need for intervention to avoid crashes. Any self driving system should have obstacle detection and avoidance capabilities.

Concerns with Unprotected Turns

Unprotected turns challenges for FSD V12.3.6. The system tends to hesitate when making these turns leading to situations where the vehicle ends up stuck in traffic flow. This includes failing to commit to traffic openings and leaving the vehicle vulnerable, in positions.
Concerns, with Advanced Driving Features

There are issues with how the system behaves in situations. For example it sometimes stops before the line. Then slowly moves forward. This creeping behavior is meant to help merge into traffic. It often creates safety risks instead. Safe driving requires being able to make these moves confidently.

Unexpected Lane Changes

The FSD V12.3.6 software often requires lane changes on highways because it doesn’t switch lanes enough before exits. This can be dangerous. Disrupt the flow of traffic. Safe highway driving involves making lane changes in an predictable manner, which needs improvement.

Challenges with Cruise Control

Moreover there are difficulties with maintaining a speed on highways using the systems cruise control feature. Sometimes it accelerates quickly from stops. Slows down suddenly leading to an unstable driving experience. Consistent cruise control is essential for highway driving.

Unreliable Auto Park Functionality

The auto park function of FSD V12.3.6 is not always reliable. It may struggle to find parking spots or park in them risking collisions with other vehicles due, to improper parking attempts. Autonomous vehicles should be able to park dependably.

Challenges with Parallel Parking

Parking remains a task for the system often resulting in the car ending up in the wrong position or sticking out from the curb requiring manual adjustments. Precise and consistent parallel parking is crucial for city transportation.

Improved Notifications

On the hand users have noticed an uptick in notifications and warnings for not paying attention when they are. This could indicate issues with the cameras ability to monitor driver focus. Excessive alerts might cause frustration and distraction for drivers.

Complex Settings

Users struggle to make changes to settings as switching to “chill mode ” for example doesn’t seem to impact aggressive driving behavior. A good user experience relies on easy settings adjustments and a user friendly interface.

Issues Specific to Hardware

Hardware 4 vs. Hardware 3

Users of Hardware 4 have expressed feeling like theres been a step compared to Hardware 3 especially when it comes to parking and navigating declines. The lack of sensors and higher resolution cameras in Hardware 4 doesn’t seem to bring improvements; at times it even leads to, below par performance. User trust depends on the consistency and reliability of hardware versions.
Safety and Public Perception Regarding Misleading Terminology

Using the term “full self driving” could mislead users into trusting the system leading to risky driving behaviors. To ensure safety it is crucial to be clear, about what the system can. Cannot do.

Potential Risks of Adoption

The risk of accidents due to users relying heavily on the system without understanding its limitations grows as more people use it. It is essential to promote usage and educate users about the systems boundaries for their safety.

Summary

Overall FSD V12.3.6 faces challenges. Despite aiming for autonomy frequent manual interventions are necessary because of issues with lane keeping, speed control making turns and parking.

Users lack of trust, in the system is exacerbated by its reactions and hesitancy indicating that further refinement is needed to enhance reliability and safety. The current state of FSD V12.3.6 highlights the need for improvements to achieve autonomous driving while ensuring safety.

Addressing these challenges is critical to prioritize safety and reliability as we explore and advance driving technology further.

Given the circumstances, at hand it’s important to keep striving for progress and maintain an outlook even though achieving autonomous driving remains a goal, for the future.

However, if after reading all these cons, you still want to buy the product, congratulations! You’re making a well-informed decision, and you won’t regret your purchase.

Reference:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0ldt01KfTY&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlMA5UrmFbg&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTsyX07c9cc&t=332s&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWTy5G1hQko&t=21s&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWV-s7S-7ZE&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=–qBme0ddng&t=628s&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdhnXSdaGlo&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oGK-SCNLSAk&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1T4ZGvn4TIk&t=353s&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6M0_3t28EY&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MA12MNFxwoA&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUfkdoqgOLk&pp=ygULZnNkIHYxMi4zLjY%3D